|
We're getting a little tired hearing nuclear industry lobbyists and pro-nuclear politicians allege that environmentalists are now supporting nuclear power as a means of addressing the climate crisis. We know that's not true, and we're sure you do too. In fact, using nuclear power would be counterproductive at reducing carbon emissions. As Amory Lovins of Rocky Mountain Institute points out, "every dollar invested in nuclear expansion will worsen climate change by buying less solution per dollar..." The simple statement below will be sent to the media and politicians whenever they misstate the facts. We hope you and your organization will join us and sign on in support here. "We do not support construction of new nuclear reactors as a means of addressing the climate crisis. Available renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies are faster, cheaper, safer and cleaner strategies for reducing greenhouse emissions than nuclear power." Sign this statement.Go to www.nirs.org The statement in Spanish Spanish.pdf The statement in French French.pdfThe statement in Ukrainian Ukrainian.pdf The statement in Russian Russian.pdf |
||
![]() We're small. We're powerful. We're anti-nuclear. We are grass-root oriented. And we are proud of what we have achieved. We are anxious to go on, serving people with important information and skills. We have existed since 1978, in a small office with seven people working at WISE Amsterdam. About WISE |
![]() Do you want this as a poster (A2)? Drop us an e-mail at wiseamster@antenna.nl |
![]() 2008 will mark the 30th anniversary of Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS). About NIRS |
| "if you think you are too small to be effective you have never slept with a mosquito" | ||